I seem to remember around the time I joined here (and foolishly thought everyone was having a go at him as I had been fooled by the various statements he had made and actually came out in his defense - please forgive me ) that he had, to date, only been sent "cease and desist" notices which he made very light of at the time and said he would be carrying on as usual and dared Disney to take it further. There was a discussion on why Disney had never sued him. The conclusion, if I remember correctly, was the possible bad publicity due to the "charity" (I use the term loosely) aspect of his claims. That was the best he came up with although I did make a tongue-in-cheek suggestion that maybe he knew too much and that was the price for keeping his mouth shut (not that I knew anything, just a thought as to why he was getting away with it). I couldn't find the thread again (maybe I just didn't look hard enough) but it was around a certain time when a certain person was deleting all posts he had replied to so it may have gone.