I won't speak to Bills feelings on the matter, but I would like to point out that our assumptions of what Pixar would like to do are not going to be an easy task. While the things that Eisner and Crew have done, have been remarkably shortsighted, they did generate short term profits. Cutting costs at the parks, while attendance rose, makes it seem to the shareholders that the parks will thrive while the Company saves money- ignoring the fact that the guests who are coming are not experiencing those cuts until they are at the park, thus any adverse reaction impacts future visits (and profits), not immediate ones. So say Pixars people come in and say, I want to build this great attraction, spare no expense. That expense is going to cut into this years profits, no matter how worthwhile an investment it is, how much revenue it will generate over 10 or 20 years, it will cause a dip this year.
What all that poorly explained rhetoric means, is that Pixar will be fighting to change the very nature of what Disney has become and what frankly the rest of the business world is. They succeeded fine on their own, but they were one line of business- they made CGI movies, and they pretty much invented the format, so they had a good lead on everyone else. They didn't have to worry about whether Tourism was up, how to supplement the losses from their failing retail chains, etc... etc... I would love to believe that they can do this, but it's gonna be an uphill climb.